Executive Summary

Most small-to-medium professional-services firms—roughly 3 million legal, consulting, accounting and agency practices globally—still rely on manual, error-prone time logging that creates billing leakage, client disputes and uneven utilization data. The pain is measurable: firms commonly forfeit an estimated 5–15% of billable time to forgotten entries and misclassification and spend substantial admin hours reconciling records across distributed teams. Decision-makers (partners, practice managers, controllers) want objective, auditable activity records without forcing people to change behavior. Build a passive activity-capture system that uses verticalized AI models to classify work to matters and line items, surfaces suggested time entries with an auditable trail, and offers one-click billing syncs to practice-management systems—delivered as a firm-level subscription plus per-user fees. The timing is supportive: improved activity-classification models and private/edge inference make passive capture viable, hybrid work raises demand for objective records, and the $12.0B TAM (3M firms × $4K ACV) combined with a Market Score of 92/100 and Revenue Potential of 88/100 indicates strong commercial upside. Differentiate by deep vertical focus—pre-built taxonomies, matter templates, compliance/audit features for law and accounting firms—and by shipping trusted integrations and privacy controls rather than a one-size-fits-all tracker. Strengths include faster time-to-value, reduced billing leakage and fewer disputes; honest challenges are data privacy and regulatory constraints, long sales cycles in professional services, and the operational need to reach ~90–95% classification accuracy via human-in-the-loop workflows before firms will rely solely on automation. If you can execute on vertical UX, rigorous privacy guarantees and pragmatic rollout strategies, this is a viable, high-potential opportunity; if not, integration complexity and trust barriers will significantly raise customer acquisition cost and slow adoption.

Market Opportunity

Manual, error-prone time logging → AI-driven automated capture & billing targets a $12.0B = 3M professional-services firms x $4K ACV (firm-level subscription + per-user fees, global TAM across small-medium law/consulting/accounting/agency firms) total addressable market with medium saturation and a year-over-year growth rate of 12% CAGR (time-tracking/practice-management combined market growth, driven by SaaS adoption and automation).

Key trends driving demand: AI-driven automation -- improved accuracy in activity classification makes passive time capture viable for billable work; Remote/hybrid work -- distributed teams need objective activity records and simpler billing workflows; Verticalization of SaaS -- demand for industry-specific workflows (legal/accounting/consulting) that generic trackers don't serve; API-first billing ecosystem -- Stripe/QuickBooks/ERP integrations make automated invoicing and reconciliation straightforward.

Key competitors include Timely (Memory) — Timely.ai, Toggl Track, QuickBooks Time (formerly TSheets) — Intuit, Clio, Workarounds — spreadsheets, manual timers, and agency-specific ERPs.

Sign in to access

Manual, error-prone time logging → AI-driven automated capture & billing

Executive Summary

Market Validation

Market Opportunity

More in Productivity

Fix fragmented AI workflows with an integrated AI assistant and automated templates

Voice-first writing: get words out fast with AI transcription + editor

Stop tab chaos — autonomous AI agents that orchestrate and automate workflows

Stop starting and quitting projects — automated idea validation + accountability

Automate hours-long manual tasks with LLM-driven workflow automation

Collaboration friction for remote teams — AI-coached workflows & unified async