Executive Summary

Many knowledge workers—product managers, market researchers, consultants, and academic teams—need to run multi-step research that chains multiple AI models, tools, and data sources but cannot write or maintain code. Today they rely on developers, spreadsheets, or expensive freelancers, producing slow, error-prone, and irreproducible workflows that waste time and limit adoption. You could build a no-code platform that lets non-coders assemble, run, and iterate multi-AI research workflows via a visual canvas with connectors to multiple LLMs and modalities, templated agents for literature review, hypothesis testing and data extraction, plus built-in provenance, evaluation, and exportable pipelines. Adding a model marketplace, pay-as-you-go inference, role-based collaboration, and one-click integrations to common data stores would make complex research accessible without engineers. The timing is favorable: LLM-as-a-service and cheaper access to specialized models make chaining and specialization practical, while no-code tooling accelerates adoption; this maps to a $120B addressable market (300M knowledge workers × $400/year) with a market score of 92/100 and revenue potential 88/100. Competition is medium, indicating clear opportunity but requiring disciplined execution. To stand out, prioritize rigorous provenance and evaluation so outputs are auditable, build high-quality research templates for initial verticals, and offer a hybrid deployment model that supports enterprise security and model choice. Be candid about challenges—UX complexity, managing model and compute costs, and slow enterprise procurement—and target early customers with high ARPU and measurable ROI to validate the thesis before scaling.

Market Opportunity

Non-coders: run multi-AI research workflows without writing code targets a $120B = 300M knowledge workers x $400/yr spend on productivity/AI tooling total addressable market with medium saturation and a year-over-year growth rate of 35%.

Key trends driving demand: LLM-as-a-service -- easier, cheaper access to many models enables chaining and specialization; No-code tooling -- democratizes AI workflows to non-developers and boosts adoption velocity; Multi-agent / orchestration patterns -- teams expect composite agents that handle multi-step research; Knowledge-worker automation -- rising demand to offload repetitive synthesis and analysis tasks.

Key competitors include Elicit (by Ought), Consensus, Zapier (with AI integrations), n8n (cloud & open‑source).

Sign in to access

Non-coders: run multi-AI research workflows without writing code

Executive Summary

Market Validation

Market Opportunity

More in Productivity

Fix fragmented AI workflows with an integrated AI assistant and automated templates

Voice-first writing: get words out fast with AI transcription + editor

Stop tab chaos — autonomous AI agents that orchestrate and automate workflows

Stop starting and quitting projects — automated idea validation + accountability

Automate hours-long manual tasks with LLM-driven workflow automation

Collaboration friction for remote teams — AI-coached workflows & unified async