Executive Summary

Too many knowledge workers—estimated 200 million globally—struggle to convert the books they buy into usable, queryable knowledge: longform texts are dense, fragmented across topics, and time-consuming to synthesize, which leaves insights locked behind unread pages and passive highlights. The result is wasted learning time, duplicated research, and decision-makers who rely on summaries that often omit provenance or granular claims. The product would automatically extract structured knowledge graphs from books and longform texts, surfacing entities, claims, evidence, and citations, and exporting interoperable nodes and links into PKM tools like Obsidian, Notion, and Roam. Architecturally it would combine embeddings for dense retrieval, LLMs for information extraction, domain-specific parsers for tables/figures, and a human-in-the-loop verification layer to deliver high-precision facts, provenance, and cross-book linking at a usable cost model (targeting a $300 ACV per user or team). This is a timely opportunity: advancements in LLMs and embeddings materially lower inference cost and raise extraction quality, and a $60.0B addressable market (200M knowledge workers × $300 ACV) with a Market Score of 95/100 and Revenue Potential at 82/100 signals commercial viability. Competition is medium—there are summary and note-taking tools—but standing out requires measurable accuracy, rigorous provenance, standards for export, and enterprise-grade integrations; challenges include extraction fidelity across genres, copyright/compliance, and earning user trust, so initial focus should be high-value verticals and tight PKM interoperability rather than a broad consumer play.

Market Opportunity

Too many unread books — auto-extract structured knowledge graphs from texts targets a $60.0B = 200M knowledge workers x $300 ACV total addressable market with medium saturation and a year-over-year growth rate of 18% CAGR for AI-assisted knowledge and PKM tools.

Key trends driving demand: LLM + embeddings maturation -- Enables accurate extraction, linking, and retrieval at low cost, making book-to-graph feasible.; Rise of PKM workflows -- Users demand interoperable, queryable knowledge that integrates with Obsidian, Notion, Roam and other tools.; Shift from summaries to actionable insights -- Consumers want more than abstracts; they want granular facts, claims, and provenance.; Open-source ML ecosystems -- Accelerates innovation and reduces vendor lock-in, encouraging community contributions and integrations..

Key competitors include Readwise, Blinkist, Obsidian, deepset (Haystack), Roam Research.

Sign in to access

Too many unread books — auto-extract structured knowledge graphs from texts

Executive Summary

Market Validation

Market Opportunity

More in EdTech

Writers waste time formatting/verifying citations — AI automates sourcing & formatting

Reference librarians forced to be 'AI experts' — AI‑augmented reference platform

Students constantly relearn tools; unify electronics learning with a lifelong PCB workflow

Frustrating SQL tutorials — teach applied SQL with realistic bank scenarios

Bulk digital certificate issuance — automated, verifiable credential pipelines

Mock-trial pain: practice with AI role players, no full cast needed