Many engineering teams now face unpredictable and rapidly growing token costs as models move to pay-per-token pricing, which shifts cost risk from vendors to customers. About 4 million AI/LLM-active developer teams—representing an $8.0B annual developer tooling and observability market at roughly $2,000 average spend per team—lack standardized tooling to observe, attribute, forecast and optimize token spend across prompts, endpoints, and users. You could build an open-source token-cost observability and optimizer that instruments common SDKs/callbacks, collects token-level telemetry, provides real-time dashboards, anomaly detection, allocation and forecasting, and a prompt-optimization engine that suggests lower-cost paraphrases or model selections. Keeping the core open-source lowers adoption friction and seeds shared prompt/optimization patterns, while a commercial layer (hosted analytics, RBAC, compliance) captures revenue. Market timing favors this: pay-per-token pricing transfers cost responsibility to customers, Infrastructure-as-Code for AI makes instrumentation low-friction and automatable, and prompt engineering commoditization amplifies the impact of reusable optimizations. This idea can stand out by combining a permissive open-source core with tight IaC/SDK integrations, token-aware CI checks, prompt-repo sync, and privacy-first enterprise services; the differentiator will be accurate multi-vendor token attribution and optimization that preserves model quality. Honest challenges include sustaining an open-source project financially, handling vendor API differences, and preventing simple cost cuts that degrade performance, but with medium competition and high market/revenue scores (92/100 and 88/100) there are realistic commercial paths if those technical and go-to-market risks are managed.